4 ms·

> You're going to tell me that it's "science illiterate" to consider mRNA therapy as gene therapy, because the genes are not actually changed .. Yes. That's ex

> You're going to tell me that it's "science illiterate" to consider mRNA therapy as gene therapy, because the genes are not actually changed .. Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. Read your sentence back to yourself. > But it is "scientifically literate" to call such a therapy a "vaccine"? Yes. Of course it is. Regardless of what the copy on some obscure CDC website says, mRNA vaccines have been in development for decades.

gonational 5y ago
> Regardless of what the copy on some obscure CDC website says Read that, out loud... All you need to do is set your search parameters to filter out items from the past 24 months. https://www.nature.com/gt/journal-information https://www.nature.com/gt/journal-information https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/gene-based-therapeutic-approaches-3881/ https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/gene-based-therape... There are thousands more. SMH... short memory span is the worst part of the human condition.