> Is it better/faster/more compatible than anbox? From the Anbox website: > "We're reusing what Android implemented within the QEMU-based emulator for OpenGL

> Is it better/faster/more compatible than anbox? From the Anbox website: > "We're reusing what Android implemented within the QEMU-based emulator for OpenGL ES accelerated rendering." I'm not certain but I believe WayDroid more directly attempts to provide Android drawing subsystems on top of Wayland. This should be better/faster. Cross fingers. Compatibility wise, I'm unsure. Anbox may be a more faithful Android platform perhaps. Waydroid feels like it's a closer integration to me, with less virtualized-machinery, which is a much wider support target since it's running directly atop a wide variety of hosts. But I for one am very glad we have a closer integrated option, one where Android apps are running more within the Linux desktop context. There's probably a bunch wrong with my understandings here. Hoping some even better informed people can correct/supplement.