> They replace adoptOpenJDK https://adoptopenjdk.net/ https://adoptopenjdk.net/ ... Yep, it's the same IBM team, who aren't involved in OpenJDK (and weren't wh

> They replace adoptOpenJDK https://adoptopenjdk.net/ https://adoptopenjdk.net/ ... Yep, it's the same IBM team, who aren't involved in OpenJDK (and weren't when they were called AdoptOpenJDK). They mostly know OpenJ9. > https://www.policypak.com/resources/pp-blog/oracle-java-lice https://www.policypak.com/resources/pp-blog/oracle-java-lice... Almost everything here is wrong. The prices and licensing terms are very wrong, but, most importantly, what Oracle did was, instead of provide one part-free, part-paid, JDK, we started providing two indentical ones with different licenses: one completely free, and one for support subscribers. > But a shadow of its former self. Actually, it has many more features today than it did back in 8.