I agree about scope, but they've already thrown that out the window by including biggest-'city'-in-the-zone approximations and other such cruft. However, all f

I agree about scope, but they've already thrown that out the window by including biggest-'city'-in-the-zone approximations and other such cruft. However, all fundamental use cases require naming. Therefore, it makes sense to have in scope. I dare say if this project were reconsidered today, it would be very different in form and would have at a minimum a clear scope definition and half the stuff there would be elsewhere.