4 ms·
Cardiovascular effects of nicotine are probably more dangerous than potential carcinogenic nature of smoking. edit: smoking is carcinogenic, but how much of it
by type0 5y ago
Cardiovascular effects of nicotine are probably more dangerous than potential carcinogenic nature of smoking.
edit: smoking is carcinogenic, but how much of it is because of nicotine I wouldn't know; a smoker might not live long enough to find out at what age the cancer develops if he drops dead because of the heart infarct.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- liamwire 5y agoI cannot imagine sincerely believing a statement that is so blatantly wrong. Moreover, there’s nothing ‘potentially’ carcinogenic about smoking, it is a known carcinogen.
- loeg 5y ago> Cardiovascular effects of nicotine are probably more dangerous than potential carcinogenic nature of smoking. Have any evidence to support this novel claim?
- Veen 5y agoThis is contrary to everything I have read about the health impact of nicotine. Do you have suitable references to back up these claims?
- stefan_ 5y agoSmoking is carcinogenic because it involves incomplete combustion of tobacco, the products of which are directly inhaled. Nothing to do with nicotine.