4 ms·
I added a source but hacker news isn’t fond of analysis or thinking in regards to political issues; it was flagged.
by vibrato2 5y ago
I added a source but hacker news isn’t fond of analysis or thinking in regards to political issues; it was flagged.
- Cycl0ps 5y agoReally? Let me try https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaers-deaths/fact-check-vaers-reported-vaccine-deaths-have-not-been-confirmed-or-deemed-causal-by-cdc-idUSL1N2MZ2H8 https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaers-deaths/fact-...
- josephcsible 5y agoThat's not the link that GP tried to post.
- drooby 5y agoI saw your link...I would like an explanation for why it was flagged and removed.
- thehappypm 5y agoIt's because it's nonsense. ~200M Americans have received a COVID vaccine. Some of those people died afterwards. Correlation does not imply causation.
- drooby 5y agoThere is plenty of nonsense on HN. I'd like to evaluate it for myself.
- chownie 5y agoIt might be getting flagged because the author of the PDF started out openly with the objective of linking deaths to vaccines. That or that it's not an objective document, it reads like a hit piece on vaccines with shaky evidence and random unsourced testimonials. When you read PDF with that in mind, the author's repeated pointing to the massive jump in unverified self-report stats on VAERS (right after the president of the United States cast aspersions on vaccinations to boot) doesn't really feel that compelling.
- vibrato2 5y agoSo what? It’s asserting an analysis that the vaccine is killing people. Doctors have an obligation to report adverse events on VAERS, which they don’t actually seem to be doing very frequently as far as reactions are seen.