3 ms·
hehe - Thanks for reading! I have mixed feelings about Outlook Data Files (.ost or .pst). These are great when they work, but, I think they show their age for l
by wilhil 15y ago
hehe - Thanks for reading! I have mixed feelings about Outlook Data Files (.ost or .pst). These are great when they work, but, I think they show their age for large modern mailboxes.
As for Imap, I don't really know what to say above what I wrote in that article - It is clear that Outlook is built for Exchange... That being said, I have one client (and myself) that runs IMAP from a Hmailserver box and have never had a problem.
Going over slow links/VPN when abroad has given me a lot of problems with Outlook, which I do not see whilst using a mobile device (I<device> or Android) when set to only download the last 50 messages - so, again, I agree that Outlook's handling could be a lot better.
But... On top of that, Gmail has just given me so many problems weather using Oulook, Thunderbird or a few other mail clients. If you only use Gmail through their website, it works great - but, I personally think that the way they use labels instead of folders along with a few other things (deletion etc.) made a mess when they tried to implement the IMAP protocol.
- sunchild 15y agoYes, migration from Exchange doesn't work well because of the fundamental difference between search vs. sort. I'll never use Exchange again, personally. It feels like time traveling back to 2002. I'd never use 365, but I know a lot of people are wedded to the MS platform now.