4 ms·
> But I still haven't heard an advantage of IPv6. That's my original point. Ipv6 makes NAT obsolete and useless. That is enough of a benefit to use it over Ipv
by perryizgr8 5y ago
> But I still haven't heard an advantage of IPv6.
That's my original point. Ipv6 makes NAT obsolete and useless. That is enough of a benefit to use it over Ipv4.
- evgen 5y agoYou seem to be failing at reading comprehension here. As has been repeated a couple of times, but once again in all caps for emphasis: SOME PEOPLE WANT TO USE NAT TO OBSCURE DEVICES ON THEIR NETWORK. Period. End of story. That IPv6 makes nat 'useless' is not a point in its favour or a benefit. That IPv6 NAT is inferior to IPv4 NAT makes IPv4 preferable and IPv6 something to be avoided for people who have this particular use case.
- usui 5y agoSo if IPv6 NAT worked as well as IPv4 NAT/was not buggy, you would be fine switching in a hyoothetical IPv6 mandate?