> trying to defend a corporate network against them That's not what NAT is for... That's what firewalls are for. Firewalls still exists in IPv6. The fact tha

> trying to defend a corporate network against them That's not what NAT is for... That's what firewalls are for. Firewalls still exists in IPv6. The fact that NAT sucks so much that it makes penetration harder is not a feature, it's a bug so severe it even affect hackers.