I disagree. It's not complete advice, just as telling an alcoholic to drink less isn't the complete answer. But vaguely denying the idea that what we're aimi

I disagree. It's not complete advice, just as telling an alcoholic to drink less isn't the complete answer. But vaguely denying the idea that what we're aiming for is to drink less alcohol does more harm than good. You may not realize the influence the "alternative" advice has. For many years I was confused on this, thinking that it's not as simple as CICO, that fasting and/or reducing carbs somehow did something special, etc. In the last year, I started taking weight loss more seriously, I bought into CICO, started calorie counting, and lost a bunch of weight (though to be clear, I wasnt obese, just a bit overweight). And since then, I've often thought to myself that maybe I'm misremembering exactly what I thought before, that surely I didn't really think that CICO isn't true. But I've had the opportunity since to talk to many people about this, most of them adamant that I couldn't have lost weight without giving up carbs, or that they could lose weight just by reducing carbs without any thought to total calories, or other other such things. And this alternative cute of "the experts in this field are wrong, only I an outsider can see the obvious truth that somehow vaguely you don't need to worry about calories at all" causes real harm, both to what People do, and to how they think. If someone wants to lose weight and is willing to actually put in some effort, imo the best thing to do is to count calories, reduce intake, and find out what set of foods Keeps you full and happy within that caloric window (quite possibly keto being the best option for a lot of people).