4 ms·
The ruby 3.0 binary is 19MB so I would assume at least that big. I don't think there would be really any downsides to packing it in since the chance of the user
by SilverRed 5y ago
The ruby 3.0 binary is 19MB so I would assume at least that big. I don't think there would be really any downsides to packing it in since the chance of the user having two ruby programs using the same ruby version are close to 0 anyway.
- Lio 5y agoI wonder if this could be combined with something like Sorbet Compiler[1] to help with final size? Personally I think I’d favour small static builds over linked binaries. 1. https://sorbet.org/blog/2021/07/30/open-sourcing-sorbet-compiler https://sorbet.org/blog/2021/07/30/open-sourcing-sorbet-comp...