3 ms·
I'm willing to bet those numbers are fudged. For instance, Amazon will tout how robots improve worker conditions at warehouses, when an external study says the
by OnlineGladiator 5y ago
I'm willing to bet those numbers are fudged. For instance, Amazon will tout how robots improve worker conditions at warehouses, when an external study says the opposite.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8800139/Amazon-warehouses-robots-50-percent-injuries-without.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8800139/Amaz...
- b9a2cab5 5y agoThe article implies that delivery drivers frequently drove without seatbelts on because taking them on/off was a hassle on short distance drives. It also says seatbelts and stop signs were the most commonly flagged "incidents". Make your own conclusions from that.
- mschuster91 5y agoIn Germany, this is actual law - door-to-door delivery services (postal, parcel, couriers) are exempted from the seatbelt mandate (per §21a StVO, https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stvo_2013/__21a.html https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stvo_2013/__21a.html).
- p49k 5y agoYou don’t need a dystopian AI camera monitoring system to measure seatbelt usage. Plug into OBD-2 and detect the car moving faster than 20mph while the seatbelt is not connected.
- ceejayoz 5y ago> Make your own conclusions from that. Well, that's a little tough. Is it "drivers hate seatbelts" or "drivers feel so much time pressure that extra few seconds eats into their tiny wage"?
- mrguyorama 5y agoHaving a seatbelt on or off probably wouldn't prevent an accident, so how could that reduce accidents by 40%?
- strken 5y agoYup. I'd like to see the yearly fatality rates before and after, though, since they'd likely find those harder to manipulate or cherrypick.