4 ms·
It's not. It sets ACLs so that the user that owns the process may read the coredump, but typical ls doesn't show that.
by lights0123 5y ago
It's not. It sets ACLs so that the user that owns the process may read the coredump, but typical ls doesn't show that.
- deathanatos 5y agols -l will note the presence of ACLs with a "+" next to the permissions. I typically `ls -l` or just have that aliased to ll if it isn't already… (but YMMV)