> The fact that we (or rather I) have an experience of reality as opposed to not having one is evidence that we are not simply biological machines. That's exac

> The fact that we (or rather I) have an experience of reality as opposed to not having one is evidence that we are not simply biological machines. That's exactly what a sufficiently advanced biological machine might claim. It may even believe it. If we could make an exact molecular copy of Jackie Chan, would that copy be able to speak Chinese even though it has no experience of actually speaking Chinese?