4 ms·
i would vouch for a "page-only" browser window with hover controls. like a video player
by ristretto 15y ago
i would vouch for a "page-only" browser window with hover controls. like a video player
- jokermatt999 15y agoThis is probably possible through some extensions and Firefox. The much loved TreeStyleTabs already has an option for "autohide the tab bar". If Pentadactyl/Vimperator don't already have an option for autohiding, it's probably pretty easy to script something up.
- shapoopy 15y agoPentadactyl/Vimperator do absolutely have that (set showtabline=never). I use Pentadactyl, and a Shift-B (show buffers) followed by a <tab_number>gt will get me to wherever I need to go. This is, of course, not discoverable, and therefore not really suitable for the demographic whose problems this article is hoping to solve, but for someone who's willing to put some time into learning a program (or who already uses vim), it's pretty spot-on. I, for one, love it. I should add that the problems this article is trying to solve really ought to be solved through a thorough integration of the browser tab-system with the window manager. That, of course, necessitates a thorough rethinking of the window manager, also. But that was the problem tabs alleviated in the first place, right? The WIMP model really is the walking dead.
- mun2mun 15y agoPressing b also opens show buffer window and you can select tab by pressing tab. You can also filter by title which is not possible in shift+b way.
- ristretto 15y agoIs there a similar extension for chrome / does chrome allow such modifications?
- jokermatt999 15y agoNo, Chrome's extensions are basically the same as GreaseMonkey scripts (at least, that's the frequent comparison I've heard). Firefox's extensions have the full power of XUL and can radically change the browser. engage beating a dead horse here The lack of functionality in Chrome extensions is why I (and judging from the comments I've seen in most Chrome vs Firefox threads, many other HNers on Firefox) refuse to switch to Chrome despite its much touted speed. Until I can get Pentadactyl and TreeStyleTab, its just a downgrade in usefullness.
- losvedir 15y agoYes, this is exactly what I would like, too. The vast majority of the time, I don't interact with the chrome of the window: the back and forward buttons, the address bar, tabs, etc, so why not get that out of my face while I'm not interested?
- adimitrov 15y agoVideo player's hidden controls react to mouse movement in the screen area though, a web browser would need a different heuristic — like moving the mouse close to where the controls should be or somesuch. There's people arguing, of course, that that's really poor usability, because you can't see what you can do. I guess it's a matter of taste as much as anything, and it's probably more of a power-user thing.)
- rplnt 15y agoSome browsers do that in full-screen mode now. By the way, in Opera you can configure browser that way so toolbars will auto-hide. You can assign shortcut or a gesture to them. Hovering isn't a good idea because it will eaither have to move the page (which is distracting and annoying when you do it on accident) or cover the page (which could block some content). So having it on gesture and/or shortuct would be the best way in my opinion. If you want the toolbarless experience. (I personally don't)
- sirn 15y agoIt's no longer in development, but Plainview[1] seems to fit that description. [1]: http://www.barbariangroup.com/software/plainview http://www.barbariangroup.com/software/plainview