>OK, and? I was responding to the disingenuous claims in the original post. >Nobody was shot or otherwise injured Being held at gunpoint might not cause phys

>OK, and? I was responding to the disingenuous claims in the original post. >Nobody was shot or otherwise injured Being held at gunpoint might not cause physical injuries but its dismissive to pretend it causes no injuries. >After he was released, there were no similar offenses. Why would you still want to treat him like a violent criminal 13 years later? I wouldn't, don't attribute the strawman in your head to me. More relevant to the original post I responded to I also wouldn't pretend he was only subject to a "web of laws designed to incarcerate black people" after getting punished for committing a violent crime.