3 ms·
It's not enough that the FBI return the money and assets they stole here. There need to be penalities, in the form of compensation to the people they inconvenie
by ALittleLight 5y ago
It's not enough that the FBI return the money and assets they stole here. There need to be penalities, in the form of compensation to the people they inconvenienced or forced to pay for a lawyer, and in the sense of professional or criminal consequences for the people who decided to conduct this theft.
The article says that asset forfeiture requires only a "more likely than not" standard of evidence, which seems terrible, but there's no indication that standard has been met. Most money isn't the product of drug trafficking. Seeing rubber bands and having your dog bark in the presence of the money may be slight evidence of drug dealing, but not enough to overcome the low prior.
- savant_penguin 5y agoDon't worry, the taxpayer has it covered
- ryan_lane 5y agoIn this case, they don't, because the money isn't going to be given back. It's rare for seized assets to be returned, because in most places you have to prove the money wasn't being used for crimes.