4 ms·
You are attacking the problem on the wrong side. They should have never been able to profit from that.
by harperlee 5y ago
You are attacking the problem on the wrong side. They should have never been able to profit from that.
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoWhy not attack on both sides? I absolutely agree that they should never have been able to profit from that. But, while we work on removing their ability to profit from it, why not also make it less profitable when they abuse it?
- harperlee 5y agoFair point! Makes absolute sense for me.
- klyrs 5y agoAgreed, but I'm entertaining the notion that civil forfeiture remains legal.