4 ms·
It would be interesting to know why this is downvoted: I consider myself fluent in Norwegian, did I still miss something? Edit: to be clear, I don't care at a
by skinkestek 5y ago
It would be interesting to know why this is downvoted:
I consider myself fluent in Norwegian, did I still miss something?
Edit: to be clear, I don't care at all about those stupid point. For that matter dang should be free to reset them every day like he seems to do with his own.
I only care about them as an indication of whether what I said came across as wrong or something.
- shkkmo 5y agoIt seems to be bringing up an relatively off topic political dispute without doing the work to justify the relevance or the claims being made. This makes it easy for people to see nothing more than anti carbon tax, anti socialist political baiting. This doesn't tend to lead to productive conversations and thus is likely to get downvoted on a political basis. A more productive comment would have talked about how the Norwegian carbon tax was intended to fund research and how exactly it failed to do that and instead just created profits for oil companies.
- skinkestek 5y agoOk, I see, thanks. I don't have time to fix it now, but yes, this is my point: I'm not against taxing pollution or using tax income to fund research, only against the part where we (Norway) literally gave money to companies without demanding results.