3 ms·
For high-performance there is BioJulia[1][2] ecosystem. They did comparison with Seq specifically[3]. If you are willing to help improving the state of the biol
by xvilka 5y ago
For high-performance there is BioJulia[1][2] ecosystem. They did comparison with Seq specifically[3]. If you are willing to help improving the state of the biology and genomics in Julia language, they accept donations[4] as well.
[1] https://biojulia.net/ https://biojulia.net/
[2] https://github.com/BioJulia https://github.com/BioJulia
[3] https://biojulia.net/post/seq-lang/ https://biojulia.net/post/seq-lang/
[4] https://opencollective.com/biojulia https://opencollective.com/biojulia
- sundarurfriend 5y agotl;dr of the comparison post: BioSequences (from BioJulia) used to be slower than Seq, with most of that time spent on input validation (which Seq does not do). After this paper, BioSequences was performance-tuned, so that it's now on par with Seq in speed, while still retaining input validation and other benefits. > With the updates, BioSequences [2.X] rivals Seq in speed while keeping its advantages of a lower memory footprint and doing data validation.