> at the same time they absolutely totally want NOT to prevent filtering they want to happen I'm sure there's a lot of this about, but the situation with freen

> at the same time they absolutely totally want NOT to prevent filtering they want to happen I'm sure there's a lot of this about, but the situation with freenet is more complex than that. When you run a freenet node, you are storing data on behalf of others, and you don't have access to that data so you don't know what it is. It's one thing believing that speech should be free, but that's a different thing to believing that individuals should be forced into storing and sharing speech they disagree with. It's that extra level of potential complicity in speech you find objectionable that makes freenet more problematic, and that makes accusations of hypocrisy a little unfair.