This is why creating these tools is difficult. This formulation shouldn't make it into the tool if you can have two parties agreeing but having opposite answers

This is why creating these tools is difficult. This formulation shouldn't make it into the tool if you can have two parties agreeing but having opposite answers. The question should be reformulated to allow it. We must also remember that while the tools obviously won't be the end of the story, they are still helpful. It might mean that I just have to read the party programs and watch interviews with a handful of parties instead of 10 of them. It should be compared to other alternatives of the same effort (voting the same as your parents, going with a gut feeling, ...).