3 ms·
This is canonical syntax in any functional programming language. This is like a Haskell programmer complaining that in most post-haskell languages, the keyword
by iammisc 5y ago
This is canonical syntax in any functional programming language. This is like a Haskell programmer complaining that in most post-haskell languages, the keyword class means an oop type instead a class of types.
- pharmakom 5y agoAll true, but perhaps it’s better to use something more familiar to more developers, such as x => f x Or x -> f x
- isaacimagine 5y agoPasserine[0] uses the latter syntax. [0]: https://github.com/vrtbl/passerine https://github.com/vrtbl/passerine
- Zababa 5y agoNo it's not. It's used mostly by Haskell, but ML/SML/OCaml and Scala use a different syntax.