4 ms·
It might just be that there is nothing “deeper” to understand about Chess. It’s an artificial game where the rules are the way they are because we said so - i.e
by worrycue 5y ago
It might just be that there is nothing “deeper” to understand about Chess. It’s an artificial game where the rules are the way they are because we said so - i.e. there is no “why”.
I never said AI will not get better. Just that its current level of understanding of many of the fields it’s trying to tackle is similar to that of a cargo cult’s.
- Dracophoenix 5y agoThe same could be said of music. There's nothing that inherently makes a set of frequencies between 20hz and 20khz played in a particular succession "deep". I don't think AI will ever "understand" it, because most human beings don't understand it. Because there's no inherent value to any of it. Just a confluence rules, personal decisions, circumstances and observations that has lead to the tropes and trends that make up today's - or any given period's - musical landscape.
- spywaregorilla 5y ago> There's nothing that inherently makes a set of frequencies between 20hz and 20khz played in a particular succession "deep". What about the abstract emotional perception of humans that determines if something resonates with them? You can learn that certain chord patterns have certain emotions associated with them. It's another step of difficulty to make an emotionally coherent that makes people feel something. Most art is about individual expression. Not impossible to fake, but in order to do so well you need to understand the context of the world and the salience of certain things to humans. word2vec won't win any awards for its latest single "king - man is a queen"