4 ms·
That’s a good way to demonstrate where we are with AI; it can beat a human on any given narrow definition, but still fall far short on any task that requires so
by ashtonkem 5y ago
That’s a good way to demonstrate where we are with AI; it can beat a human on any given narrow definition, but still fall far short on any task that requires some ineffable creativity, synthesis, or understanding of the word. We can make a Python script more “creative” than 95% of humans (by a meaninglessly narrow definition of creativity), but all our effort as a society has still not produced a car that can drive better than your average teenager.