4 ms·
But at least we aren't "regressing" to how societies always worked, having the expectation that a woman would prioritise the care of children over a "career".
by hirako2000 5y ago
But at least we aren't "regressing" to how societies always worked, having the expectation that a woman would prioritise the care of children over a "career".
Thanks for pointing out the separation rates. It would be misogynistic to dare considering a correlation between women not prioritising being a housewives over a career and men getting less interested in sticking around.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- RHSeeger 5y ago> But at least we aren't "regressing" to how societies always worked, having the expectation that a woman would prioritise the care of children over a "career". No, but where there are 2 parents involved in the child's birth (most cases), we _should_ have the expectation that both of those parents contribute to raising the child, barring edge cases.
- wrycoder 5y agoAnd over the history of humans, they contribute in very different ways. It's a contemporary fantasy to claim they don't and to think this is progressive.
- hirako2000 5y agoProgressive forces don't have the agenda they outline. Just repeat the same lie many times and it becomes truth.