5 ms·
And we are destroying our society by normalizing this behavior.
by wrycoder 5y ago
And we are destroying our society by normalizing this behavior.
- hirako2000 5y agoBut at least we aren't "regressing" to how societies always worked, having the expectation that a woman would prioritise the care of children over a "career". Thanks for pointing out the separation rates. It would be misogynistic to dare considering a correlation between women not prioritising being a housewives over a career and men getting less interested in sticking around.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- RHSeeger 5y ago> But at least we aren't "regressing" to how societies always worked, having the expectation that a woman would prioritise the care of children over a "career". No, but where there are 2 parents involved in the child's birth (most cases), we _should_ have the expectation that both of those parents contribute to raising the child, barring edge cases.
- wrycoder 5y agoAnd over the history of humans, they contribute in very different ways. It's a contemporary fantasy to claim they don't and to think this is progressive.
- hirako2000 5y agoProgressive forces don't have the agenda they outline. Just repeat the same lie many times and it becomes truth.
- katbyte 5y agoNormalizing what behaviour exactly?
- wrycoder 5y agoEr, it's detailed in the comment to which I responded.
- mistrial9 5y agothe joke is on the USA - "normal" is quite different in most of the world. Your reaction to unmarried mothers is warrented, yet, plural marriage and restrictions by the State on marriage, are "normal" by sheer numbers, not the USA ways. colleagues - different can mean really different. Even sophisticated people don't see it .. reality speaks in its own ways