4 ms·

How does it measure up to LBRY / Odysee?

• southerntofu 5y ago
  LBRY appears to be a BTC-forked blockchain, which has a number of disadvantages: - every node needs to keep a complete history of the ledger so as the network grows only the biggest players can stay up... what does that say of Sybil/51% attacks? - every video published has a public record, and i assume everyone paying to watch a video is also recorded publicly; no private communities - their blockchain can only (according to odysee website) process 10K events per second... which they're proud of for some reason? that's a very low number compared to eg. Bittorrent DHT or Fediverse activity - LBRY appears to favorize traditional "intellectual property" and pay-per-view model, not a donation-based economy of libre content - LBRY relies on a "cryptocoin" to achieve their economic model, and their tech was not conceived to prevent speculation; i would even argue it's architectured for speculation, as it's based on Bitcoin without learning from any of Bitcoin's weaknesses/mistakes (from what i could read) ; Tribler/Taler sound like much more reliable solutions for such microtransactions - LBRY is pushed by a for-profit company, whereas Peertube is developed by a bunch of volunteers, coordinated by the french libre culture/software non-profit Framasoft as part of their "Degooglize Internet" campaign [0] [0] https://degooglisons-internet.org/en/ https://degooglisons-internet.org/en/