3 ms·
Ironically this is the exact point criticised by the article. Namely people's preference for pseudoscientifically presented factoids of arbitrary provenance ov
by tpoacher 5y ago
Ironically this is the exact point criticised by the article.
Namely people's preference for pseudoscientifically presented factoids of arbitrary provenance over more fruitful, curated discussions in more approachable, honest language.