Does rather seem like a filter for non-numeracy. This could contribute to outliers and looking at the raw data there is too much scatter for me to recognize a

Does rather seem like a filter for non-numeracy. This could contribute to outliers and looking at the raw data there is too much scatter for me to recognize a very definitive comparison. Plus with a common y-axis but different x-axes terms, the slopes can not be as meaningful relatively as I would like to see. More helpful normalization might be possible with a much larger data set. However it can be seen that only two participants had learning rate scores 1.6 or above, so those must be the same two points on each applicable graph. Notice they were at the high end of all three tested characteristics.