2 ms·
> What’s even stranger are the many reports of burnout from people early in their career. High-power-track jobs like banking and law are scrambling to keep thei
by jrockway 5y ago
> What’s even stranger are the many reports of burnout from people early in their career. High-power-track jobs like banking and law are scrambling to keep their young workers from quitting.
I think I know what's going on here. I've been learning machining for the past couple years. The first thing you learn are feeds and speeds, and everyone tells you to look them up in the Machinery's Handbook. What they don't tell you is that the feeds and speeds there are targeted at high volume industrial output; how to turn every watt of electricity you put into your 5 million dollar CNC machine into profit. It targets a 15 minute tool life. If you're making $10,000 parts 24/7, then buying a new drill every 15 minutes is nothing. But it isn't what hobbyists want; their machines can't drive the tool that hard, and they don't have the money to buy new tools every 15 minutes. (To be fair, 15 minutes is not as short as it sounds, which is why you can get away with using their feeds and speeds as a hobbyist.)
Similarly, I think the software engineering practices project management techniques that we commonly use have similar "15 minute engineer life" targets, it's just that nobody knows that. A big problem that project management tooling tries to address is "student syndrome". That's where someone gives you 3 weeks to do a 2 week project, and humans naturally spend two weeks slacking off and then 1 week doing 50% of the project. The "solution" is to just give you only one week to do the project. It's half done, whatever, but at least you didn't slack off for two weeks. Unfortunately, you do that for a year and then burn out. There is never the mental satisfaction of a job well done, there is only more work and constant negotiating for the time and space in which to do the work. Basically, they think that people will have 40 year careers, but run them at feeds and speeds that only let them last for 15 minutes. Of course everyone is quitting due to burn out, and "lying flat" instead.
- AnEro 5y agoI hate articles like this because it drops the nuance of the work being done. It's so much complicated than people are lazy now. To your point, I think everyone has been getting tighter and tighter schedules. To be fair to the author, they could even be a good example of this. Where there's so much nuance to this topic they have deadlines, do they deep dive and outline possible effects and differences, maybe find some other seemingly unrelated studies to compare economic conditions? Or get the writing equivalent of the MVP out, so we can have these conversations about the nuance of it and just drive more traffic to the article in the process.
- over_bridge 5y agoUnmotivated is a better word for it than lazy. I think part of it is that jobs are so siloed and abstract now that it's hard to connect our efforts with the outcomes. Sometimes I get hit with a wave of 'all I do is stare at this rectangle and push buttons all day.' It's so far removed from what a single one of my ancestors would have considered time well spent. It's not a surprise that we're not jumping out of bed rearing to go. I know its not efficient but I'd love to just do an entire process end to end instead of many iterations of one piece of it - endlessly and without closure or satisfaction.