4 ms·
> OpenJDK: "Oracle’s free, GPL-licensed, production-ready OpenJDK" I don't know what could be more convincing than an explicit open license. lack of enterprise
by eganist 5y ago
> OpenJDK: "Oracle’s free, GPL-licensed, production-ready OpenJDK" I don't know what could be more convincing than an explicit open license.
lack of enterprise support.
And also what javajosh said. Here's a(n arguably biased) corroboration: https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/corporate-and-company-law/1038660/8203warning-to-oracle-customers-don39t-be-fooled-by-oracle39s-java-playbook-oracle-is-not-your-friend https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/corporate-and-company-la...
- filomeno 5y ago> lack of enterprise support. You don't get that with Java 8 either, unless you are willing to pay for it. In that case, what's the difference between paying Oracle for support for Java 8 and newer releases?
- jatins 5y agowhat does enterprise support mean in context of a programming language?
- javajosh 5y agoIt means having a service that you can contact with questions about the platform. For example, if you're having a weird GC problem you can pay Red Hat $300/hr to have a presumed expert (ideally a committer to OpenJDK) look at it with you and help you solve it. There may also be variants of this where you "subscribe" and get a certain number of support hours.
- ozzythecat 5y agoI'm curious if there is really a strong need for this service. What kinds of problems is a company solving and at what scale, that they need to have dedicated support with the language?