5 ms·

Sweden has the same numbers as Germany. Sweden and Germany are very similar with respect to culture, clustering of people in cities, percentage of people with a

Sweden has the same numbers as Germany. Sweden and Germany are very similar with respect to culture, clustering of people in cities, percentage of people with a migration background. Norway and Sweden are not. Turns out that Sweden and Germany have similar results: https://ianmsc.substack.com/p/why-does-no-one-ever-talk-about-sweden https://ianmsc.substack.com/p/why-does-no-one-ever-talk-abou...

tigershark 5y ago
Yeah, right. Let’s compare Sweden with 10M people and a very low population density with Germany with 83M people and 10 times the population density instead of Norway that has comparable population and density and 10 times less deaths just because it helps your narrative. Such comments spreading misinformation should not be allowed at all here in my opinion.
- 8note 5y ago
  Empty land doesn't get sick. The people in Sweden are concentrated in one fairly dense area, Stockholm. I don't think the overall #people/surface area of the country is something meaningful to compare. I hypothesize that comparing Sweden and Germany is about the same as comparing Stockholm to an average of German cities. I don't have the German and Swedish skills to find and compare the data though
  - tigershark 5y ago
    “Empty land doesn't get sick” That’s exactly the point. In Norway and Sweden, unlike Germany, there is a huge amount of empty land. For this reason it doesn’t make sense at all to compare Sweden with Germany when you have a far, far better comparison in the nearby country.
    - jgwil2 5y ago
      If you have a hypothetical country with a huge swath of empty land, and a single city with the population density of Hong Kong, the population density of that country will appear to be low, but in fact all the people living in the country live in a highly dense city. Perhaps a better measure than population/land area would be the average of the population density in the square kilometer surrounding each inhabitant (or something like that).
  - bildung 5y ago
    > The people in Sweden are concentrated in one fairly dense area, Stockholm. So exactly like Norway, were almost all people live around Oslo/Bergen

tigershark 5y ago

Yeah, right. Let’s compare Sweden with 10M people and a very low population density with Germany with 83M people and 10 times the population density instead of Norway that has comparable population and density and 10 times less deaths just because it helps your narrative. Such comments spreading misinformation should not be allowed at all here in my opinion.

8note 5y ago
Empty land doesn't get sick. The people in Sweden are concentrated in one fairly dense area, Stockholm. I don't think the overall #people/surface area of the country is something meaningful to compare. I hypothesize that comparing Sweden and Germany is about the same as comparing Stockholm to an average of German cities. I don't have the German and Swedish skills to find and compare the data though
- tigershark 5y ago
  “Empty land doesn't get sick” That’s exactly the point. In Norway and Sweden, unlike Germany, there is a huge amount of empty land. For this reason it doesn’t make sense at all to compare Sweden with Germany when you have a far, far better comparison in the nearby country.
  - jgwil2 5y ago
    If you have a hypothetical country with a huge swath of empty land, and a single city with the population density of Hong Kong, the population density of that country will appear to be low, but in fact all the people living in the country live in a highly dense city. Perhaps a better measure than population/land area would be the average of the population density in the square kilometer surrounding each inhabitant (or something like that).
- bildung 5y ago
  > The people in Sweden are concentrated in one fairly dense area, Stockholm. So exactly like Norway, were almost all people live around Oslo/Bergen