3 ms·
This same quality may be part of why it has never gained significant traction though, the proliferation of components and resulting fragmentation have made it a
by AnIdiotOnTheNet 5y ago
This same quality may be part of why it has never gained significant traction though, the proliferation of components and resulting fragmentation have made it a difficult target for application developers. Oh, sure, FOSS applications work fine... because they're open source and rely on unpaid third parties to integrate them into whatever absurdly interdependent ecosystem (a.k.a "distro") you happen to be using. Well, for some definitions of "fine", since they're often out of date, sometimes altered, or otherwise not packaged at all.
It also makes troubleshooting a lot more difficult, since any efforts to find solutions will invariably land me in posts primarily about some other combination of components and it's up to me to sort out their relevance to my issue.
- tapia 5y agoI think that's why we have flatpack now.
- hkt 5y agoAlso snap. And AppImage. Distros have failed conceptually under the stress of too much software, some more than others. I'd say Debian has fared worst and Arch best.
- curt15 5y agoCanonical is trying really hard to promote its snap format as an alternative. Firefox will be shipped as a snap in Ubuntu 21.10.