> The pure libertarian view is that if it is a net benefit to twitter (including where less expenditure on moderation outweighs the costs of poorer quality of m

> The pure libertarian view is that if it is a net benefit to twitter (including where less expenditure on moderation outweighs the costs of poorer quality of moderation), then it's a good idea. > Libertarianism centers around the individual. Which is why it disagrees with the notion that a private person or group should be regulated even if that might increase net liberty in society as a whole. Please explain how the second proposition makes the first libertarian. How I read it is: Libertarianism limits regulation, and thus doesn't prevent the extreme capitalist view of optimizing cost of operation, but in itself, Libertarianism doesn't say: "seek profit by all means". Or is your definition not precise enough?