2 ms·
Inoculation dates back longer than strictly sterilizing vaccination. I don’t think there’s a legal argument against mass vaccination. Apropos of nothing, today
by moistly 5y ago
Inoculation dates back longer than strictly sterilizing vaccination. I don’t think there’s a legal argument against mass vaccination.
Apropos of nothing, today a group of anti vaccination lunatics terrorized several schools in an adjacent school districts. This, after disrupting a hospital that is at the bursting limits with mostly unvaccinated Delta victims.
Public health interests have always had ultimate priority over personal health decisions.
- walterbell 5y agoFortunately, lawyers have monetary incentives to fund evidence collection, e.g. autopsies that would otherwise never take place, or expensive genome sequencing to identify which variant infected a vaccinated person, to quantify public health benefits, costs and risks. The fuzzier the claims, the happier the lawyers. Pharma manufacturers and governments may not have liability, but a range of individuals and organizations may be surprised to find themselves liable for "mandates" not encoded in legislation. OSHA has rules which require employers to track all adverse events from mandated vaccines, but these are not currently being enforced. That ambiguity should make lawyers happy, NSW in Australia has proposed that employers be liable for worker vaccine injuries when the vaccine is mandated by the government.