2 ms·
It seems pessimistic, but it's only pessimism if you accept the current systems that are in place (economic, human relational, etc.). I actually think that the
by blunte 5y ago
It seems pessimistic, but it's only pessimism if you accept the current systems that are in place (economic, human relational, etc.).
I actually think that there can be great joy, mutual success, and net-postive happiness amongst people if they are willing to reconsider the rules and boundaries set by 1-20 generations before them.
Just as with studies and news articles, it's important to consider who benefits from the message being presented. Quite often, it's the "establishment".
After all, the establishment has tried to convince us that smoking was good for you, that mastubation would make you blind (and a host of other maladies), that burning fossil fuels wouldn't harm the environment, that eating low-fat packaged goods wouldn't make us fat, that drinking diet sodas wouldn't make us fat, that vaping wouldn't do some really wack stuff to us, that politicians represented us, etc. etc.
There are places in the world today where a woman breastfeeding in public is considered offensive. Who made that determination? (I use this example because it's about the most natural human activity, perhaps beside sex.) And yet, much of the US establishment wants us to believe that it's inappropriate. All of these crazy rules and artificial limitations could be much of what's wrong with our relationships and our behavior. I'm trying to point out the absurdity of things.