4 ms·
> They have no track record of trust. Its worse. They have a consistent track record for asking for trust and then breaking it in most abusive way possible, th
by e3bc54b2 5y ago
> They have no track record of trust.
Its worse. They have a consistent track record for asking for trust and then breaking it in most abusive way possible, then issuing a non-apology only after getting caught and then repeating same process all-over again. Oh, I forgot mentioning FB getting rich in the process, so it somehow becomes justified and has zero chance for change.
- aierou 5y agoAren't all recorded breaches of trust (outside of admittedly predatory data collection schemes endemic to the software industry) the result of unprecedented attacks on social networks as a construct? How would one anticipate such attacks? I think it's fair to say that Facebook grew too quickly to mitigate the issues inherent to social networks at scale. I don't think that makes them abusive or evil, just naive.
- freeone3000 5y agoRemember the time they asked for your phone number for 2FA and then used it for contact linking?
- bobthepanda 5y agoThere was that one time they conducted a study on emotion manipulation on 700,000 people without informed consent. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/30/facebook-emotion-study-breached-ethical-guidelines-researchers-say https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/30/facebook-...