3 ms·
Confusingly, while the README says AGPL/commercial, the LICENSE file (https://github.com/jorisschellekens/borb/blob/master/LICENSE https://github.com/jorisschel
by mkl 5y ago
Confusingly, while the README says AGPL/commercial, the LICENSE file (https://github.com/jorisschellekens/borb/blob/master/LICENSE https://github.com/jorisschellekens/borb/blob/master/LICENSE) says it's GPL.
- mdaniel 5y agoI'd guess it's just a copy-pasta error, because all the source files contain the AGPL header text: https://github.com/jorisschellekens/borb/blob/v2.0.9.1/borb/__init__.py#L7 https://github.com/jorisschellekens/borb/blob/v2.0.9.1/borb/... and https://github.com/jorisschellekens/borb/blob/v2.0.9.1/borb/pdf/__init__.py#L7 https://github.com/jorisschellekens/borb/blob/v2.0.9.1/borb/... for example But the plot thickens! It seems the top-level LICENSE file was actually changed 13 days ago _away_ from AGPL https://github.com/jorisschellekens/borb/blame/master/LICENSE https://github.com/jorisschellekens/borb/blame/master/LICENS... So, yeah, confusingly for sure
- sigg3 5y agoAn AMBIGUOUS LICENSE situation is a red flag. Was the issue raised with the author?