To be clear the article says vaccine passports == good. Immunity passports would somehow violate laws protecting those with disabilities. Hard to understand h

To be clear the article says vaccine passports == good. Immunity passports would somehow violate laws protecting those with disabilities. Hard to understand how that works. So assuming we live in a world with 2 types of passports where you must possess one to be free within that country. Are disabled people exempt outright from these restrictions? If yes then how could they be discriminated against, if no then go to next step. If a disabled person doesn't get vaccinated and cannot produce antibodies then they are being discriminated against by both types of passports. If the disabled person does get vaccinated and cannot/will not produce the antibodies to get both passports then they are not disciminated because you only need 1 of 2 passports to get around. I cannot believe someone bothered to express this ridiculous line of reasoning. I've got to be missing something.