3 ms·
What about disable people? The fact you don't see a purpose doesn't mean there isn't.
by tinyhouse 5y ago
What about disable people? The fact you don't see a purpose doesn't mean there isn't.
- mnd999 5y agoIf their disability is no concern for their own privacy then sure. Voice control might be a need, Alexa voice control shouldn’t be.
- tinyhouse 5y agoAgain, you're making assumptions that people worry about privacy like you are. You're also making an assumption that people think like you that Alexa harms their privacy. Finally, your first sentence is pretty ignorant I must say. Let people in a wheelchair talk about Alexa and their tradeoffs. Personally I have an Alexa but don't find it too appealing. I barely use it. My kids use it much more often. I don't worry about privacy. I trust Amazon (or Google/Apple/Microsoft) that non of the audio is saved or sent to the cloud unless the device hears the trigger word. Can someone hack it and listen to our interactions at home? I'm assuming it's possible but that's true for our phones too.