I read both, and they have different pictures. The original article, with the older time estimate, had a much more worn camel pic than the other one with the 20

I read both, and they have different pictures. The original article, with the older time estimate, had a much more worn camel pic than the other one with the 2000 year estimate. Hence my wondering if that maybe means something. Unfortunately it's vague whether or not the different pictures are from different time periods, different sites, or what exactly.