4 ms·
Most North American road infrastructure has been rebuilt over the last century to be automobile-centric. "We" deem that conflict to be acceptable because the al
by SECProto 5y ago
Most North American road infrastructure has been rebuilt over the last century to be automobile-centric. "We" deem that conflict to be acceptable because the alternative is more complicated phasing - most of which results in delays to car traffic (and pedestrians!), and so most places won't accept it. For details, here's [1] a document that outlines the tradeoffs in various different signal phasing designs.
TL;DR is that "we" won't prioritize any road user except the automobile.
[1] https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop08024/chapter4.htm#4.3 https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop08024/chapter4....
- takk309 5y agoI agree completely with this comment. Most places signal timing is done with the main scoring metric of reducing vehicle delay. Pedestrians are just an after thought that can be squeezed into a vehicle specific timing plan. As an example, how often do you see a pedestrian scramble, walk signals in all directions, outside of somewhere like Time Square?
- benrbray 5y agoSome of the problematic intersections in Atlanta have slowly been replaced with scrambles, and it's amazing as a pedestrian. I hope to see more and more of those!