> In a proper Lisp you can take anything that in a regular language would be a language feature and implement it as a library. I should have been perhaps a bit

> In a proper Lisp you can take anything that in a regular language would be a language feature and implement it as a library. I should have been perhaps a bit more clear, though T9 makes that hard. I mean more in the sense of standardization. In some ways, LISP makes a better case for what I've suggested simply because you can modify the syntax with such relative ease. If you see patterns emerge, it makes it easier to standardize a syntactic construction to make it less idiosyncratic.