3 ms·
Does a NATO county selling weapons to a NATO strategic adversary not seem mildly questionable on its own?
by lvs 5y ago
Does a NATO county selling weapons to a NATO strategic adversary not seem mildly questionable on its own?
- wonnage 5y agoThey're just not thinking big enough, the US has been creating its own strategic adversaries by selling weapons to terrorists and regretting it 20 years later for decades
- ClumsyPilot 5y agoThese ships are not a real problem. The credible part of Russian navy is nuclear submarines. Russian surface navy is not, and won't be a threat to Nato, with or without them. There isn't really a country theatened by Russia where sea is a relevant theater - it's always a land border Pales in comparison with amount of US weapons left in middle east, supplied to Saudi, etc. The diffetence is Russia has some standards, they don't do things like 9/11.
- kevin_thibedeau 5y agoThe Euro strategy is to make themselves vassals of Russia to appear less threatening. Look at how Germany walked away from nuclear and made themselves dependent on Russian natural gas.
- gdy 5y agoApparently Germany sees Russia a smaller threat than the possibility of a nuclear incident at its aging nuclear plants.
- gdy 5y ago"NATO strategic adversary" That's not what NATO had been telling Russia when expanding into Eastern European and ex-USSR countries.