> If it works, it's science. If it doesn't work, it's not science. I would suggest that "science" is loosely based around the idea that objective truth can be

> If it works, it's science. If it doesn't work, it's not science. I would suggest that "science" is loosely based around the idea that objective truth can be derived through collection of empirical evidence by attempting to reject null hypotheses. Of course it is incredibly limited and we ascribe credit to "science" for a lot of things which are not "science".