5 ms·

I am a professional traffic engineer and I build micro-simulation models for most of the projects I am involved with. I can say that compared to software that i

I am a professional traffic engineer and I build micro-simulation models for most of the projects I am involved with. I can say that compared to software that is used in industry (PTV Vissim, PTV Vistro, and Trafficware Synchro) it looks like A/B is a reasonable toy model that can get pretty close to the real thing. I think it is great that software exists at a level for individuals without huge budgets to be able to build and play around with traffic networks. Automating the intersection setup goes a long way toward this type of tool being accessible to the lay person. All that being said, I think the limitations of any model are important to understand when interpreting the outputs. I can take any model and make traffic flow or decrease the delay per vehicle, that doesn't mean my results are realistic. Keep up the work, this is an awesome tool and I hope it can get to the point where it can easily help inform people about traffic design and simulation.

anigbrowl 5y ago
What kinds of feedback does your profession care about? I am constantly frustrated as a pedestrian with the traffic flow and signal timing problems in my area but I feel like it's pointless to submit a complaint to my local municipality because my anecdotal data points will probably be disregarded. I'm not very good at nor patient for trying to do neighborhood people organization and go around in circles with City Hall for 5 years (as has been the case with other neighborhood things like park use etc. that I have previously been involved in). But I am tried of losing about 5-6 hours a year to excess wait times at intersections despite trying to avoid the slowest crossings.
- SECProto 5y ago
  I've lived a few different places, also working in transportation engineering. I personally care a great deal about accessibility, and would much rather delay cars slightly than pedestrians (for numerous reasons). For example, when reviewing traffic control plans, etc, I always make comments or suggest changes along those lines. But ultimately, it comes down to what the municipality wants to prioritize - unless there are safety issues, it's hard to do more than suggest and push for something better. If you want to make a difference, making comments (about ongoing projects, particularly) will tend to have more impact. For something more systemic (like light cycles deprioritizing pedestrians), I found the best solution was to move to a better city. If that's not a solution for you :) then another option you might want to consider is having a meeting with your municipal (or even higher) level elected representative - invite them for a walkthrough of a more problematic space, and try to explain the issues and possible solutions as calmly/rationally as possible. And without attacking car culture directly, as that tends to get people defensive.
  - benrbray 5y ago
    Can you or any other traffic engineers here tell me why we find it acceptable that cars are allowed to make unprotected left turns while pedestrians have a walk signal? Right turn on red is bad enough, but unprotected lefts give drivers a direct incentive to torpedo into crossing cyclists / pedestrians, as slowing down would mean a collision with oncoming traffic! Too many intersections in downtown Atlanta, for instance, have no left turn arrow, and I felt constantly in danger.
    - SECProto 5y ago
      Most North American road infrastructure has been rebuilt over the last century to be automobile-centric. "We" deem that conflict to be acceptable because the alternative is more complicated phasing - most of which results in delays to car traffic (and pedestrians!), and so most places won't accept it. For details, here's [1] a document that outlines the tradeoffs in various different signal phasing designs. TL;DR is that "we" won't prioritize any road user except the automobile. [1] https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop08024/chapter4.htm#4.3 https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop08024/chapter4....
      - takk309 5y ago
        I agree completely with this comment. Most places signal timing is done with the main scoring metric of reducing vehicle delay. Pedestrians are just an after thought that can be squeezed into a vehicle specific timing plan. As an example, how often do you see a pedestrian scramble, walk signals in all directions, outside of somewhere like Time Square?
        benrbray 5y ago
        Some of the problematic intersections in Atlanta have slowly been replaced with scrambles, and it's amazing as a pedestrian. I hope to see more and more of those!
  - anigbrowl 5y ago
    Thanks a lot for the feedback. I live near a traffic artery so I've always known there were trade-offs, but the frustration does mount after a while. My #1 beef is when the traffic is paused but you just missed the light change when you hit the ped xing button, and now it's not safe to rely on the light staying green while you dart across.
- micromacrofoot 5y ago
  I hate to say it, but the only thing that has ever worked for me is doing neighborhood people organization and going around in circles with City Hall for 5 years. I have done some ridiculous things, including the "Shawshank Redemption" method of sending a letter every day until I get a response... I know my city counselor well enough to have literally eaten dinner in her home, and none of it worked. I've seen the neighborhood people organization method work faster than someone dying to fix inadequate traffic management.
dabreegster 5y ago
Thank you for the industry insight! I'm definitely not trying to match the degree of realism and calibration with the professional stuff -- there's no way I could, without way more resources. A/B Street's simulation is more for visualization than getting meaningful results -- although I am quite proud of the dataviz we've baked in. From talking to planners, reaching for these tools is a huge time and money commitment, even assuming they have a license and somebody trained to use it. Some ideas don't even get off the ground, and some projects take community feedback after spending months building the initial models. I think there's a huge missing space for rapid prototyping. The fact that I see planning agencies regularly include graphics from streetmix.net is evidence of this -- it's a quick way to communicate, so often how a conversation starts. I'd simply like to expand that space.
- takk309 5y ago
  At the end of the day better communication between the public, engineers, planners, and respective agencies is the goal. We have a joke that gets repeated all too often, everyone is a traffic engineer, just ask them! Rapid iteration is key to be able to look at all scenarios, no matter how crazy they may be.
jerry1979 5y ago
As someone with interest in traffic models, what spaces do you or your peers hang out outline?
- takk309 5y ago
  That is a tough question because I can't think of any places really. Maybe look into the Institute of Traffic Engineers, they may have a forum of some sort.

anigbrowl 5y ago

What kinds of feedback does your profession care about? I am constantly frustrated as a pedestrian with the traffic flow and signal timing problems in my area but I feel like it's pointless to submit a complaint to my local municipality because my anecdotal data points will probably be disregarded. I'm not very good at nor patient for trying to do neighborhood people organization and go around in circles with City Hall for 5 years (as has been the case with other neighborhood things like park use etc. that I have previously been involved in). But I am tried of losing about 5-6 hours a year to excess wait times at intersections despite trying to avoid the slowest crossings.

SECProto 5y ago
I've lived a few different places, also working in transportation engineering. I personally care a great deal about accessibility, and would much rather delay cars slightly than pedestrians (for numerous reasons). For example, when reviewing traffic control plans, etc, I always make comments or suggest changes along those lines. But ultimately, it comes down to what the municipality wants to prioritize - unless there are safety issues, it's hard to do more than suggest and push for something better. If you want to make a difference, making comments (about ongoing projects, particularly) will tend to have more impact. For something more systemic (like light cycles deprioritizing pedestrians), I found the best solution was to move to a better city. If that's not a solution for you :) then another option you might want to consider is having a meeting with your municipal (or even higher) level elected representative - invite them for a walkthrough of a more problematic space, and try to explain the issues and possible solutions as calmly/rationally as possible. And without attacking car culture directly, as that tends to get people defensive.
- benrbray 5y ago
  Can you or any other traffic engineers here tell me why we find it acceptable that cars are allowed to make unprotected left turns while pedestrians have a walk signal? Right turn on red is bad enough, but unprotected lefts give drivers a direct incentive to torpedo into crossing cyclists / pedestrians, as slowing down would mean a collision with oncoming traffic! Too many intersections in downtown Atlanta, for instance, have no left turn arrow, and I felt constantly in danger.
  - SECProto 5y ago
    Most North American road infrastructure has been rebuilt over the last century to be automobile-centric. "We" deem that conflict to be acceptable because the alternative is more complicated phasing - most of which results in delays to car traffic (and pedestrians!), and so most places won't accept it. For details, here's [1] a document that outlines the tradeoffs in various different signal phasing designs. TL;DR is that "we" won't prioritize any road user except the automobile. [1] https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop08024/chapter4.htm#4.3 https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop08024/chapter4....
    - takk309 5y ago
      I agree completely with this comment. Most places signal timing is done with the main scoring metric of reducing vehicle delay. Pedestrians are just an after thought that can be squeezed into a vehicle specific timing plan. As an example, how often do you see a pedestrian scramble, walk signals in all directions, outside of somewhere like Time Square?
      - benrbray 5y ago
        Some of the problematic intersections in Atlanta have slowly been replaced with scrambles, and it's amazing as a pedestrian. I hope to see more and more of those!
- anigbrowl 5y ago
  Thanks a lot for the feedback. I live near a traffic artery so I've always known there were trade-offs, but the frustration does mount after a while. My #1 beef is when the traffic is paused but you just missed the light change when you hit the ped xing button, and now it's not safe to rely on the light staying green while you dart across.
micromacrofoot 5y ago
I hate to say it, but the only thing that has ever worked for me is doing neighborhood people organization and going around in circles with City Hall for 5 years. I have done some ridiculous things, including the "Shawshank Redemption" method of sending a letter every day until I get a response... I know my city counselor well enough to have literally eaten dinner in her home, and none of it worked. I've seen the neighborhood people organization method work faster than someone dying to fix inadequate traffic management.

dabreegster 5y ago

Thank you for the industry insight! I'm definitely not trying to match the degree of realism and calibration with the professional stuff -- there's no way I could, without way more resources. A/B Street's simulation is more for visualization than getting meaningful results -- although I am quite proud of the dataviz we've baked in. From talking to planners, reaching for these tools is a huge time and money commitment, even assuming they have a license and somebody trained to use it. Some ideas don't even get off the ground, and some projects take community feedback after spending months building the initial models. I think there's a huge missing space for rapid prototyping. The fact that I see planning agencies regularly include graphics from streetmix.net is evidence of this -- it's a quick way to communicate, so often how a conversation starts. I'd simply like to expand that space.

takk309 5y ago
At the end of the day better communication between the public, engineers, planners, and respective agencies is the goal. We have a joke that gets repeated all too often, everyone is a traffic engineer, just ask them! Rapid iteration is key to be able to look at all scenarios, no matter how crazy they may be.

jerry1979 5y ago

As someone with interest in traffic models, what spaces do you or your peers hang out outline?

takk309 5y ago
That is a tough question because I can't think of any places really. Maybe look into the Institute of Traffic Engineers, they may have a forum of some sort.