2 ms·
Felt like political pressure meant Marks could not leave that room without some positive vote, and they would make up questions until it happened. Sad day for
by kaczordon 5y ago
Felt like political pressure meant Marks could not leave that room without some positive vote, and they would make up questions until it happened.
Sad day for science. No one on earth can tell a 65 yo or HCW with confidence that they will be better off after the booster than before. No good efficacy data, no good safety data on boosters.
- mrtesthah 5y agoYou just wrote FDA fan fiction. This comment shows how peoples’ unwitting exposure to political propaganda shapes their view of reality via an implicit bias which they interpret as “gut feelings”.
- kaczordon 5y agoNext week the CDC’s ACIP is scheduled to meet to explore boosters as well. ACIP advises the CDC on whether it should recommend use of vaccines the FDA has approved, one might conclude that the timing of the meetings is premised on the FDA approving the Pfizer application, otherwise the CDC is in an awkward position. Not to mention: accidental vote made up new voting question on the fly 10 minutes to deliberate the evidence used very vague terms in the vote You obviously didn’t watch the meeting.
- oezi 5y agoHow can you say that? Doesn't the data from Israel show clearly that boosters are effective and safe?