Some of the common answers that make me differ: > Social welfare should not be free. There are low skilled jobs that can be done by most. ... Most people are

Some of the common answers that make me differ: > Social welfare should not be free. There are low skilled jobs that can be done by most. ... Most people are not able to do anything productive for the society, expect for in a limited number of positions. It would be more expensive to provide a job for everybody (training, commute, supervision). Many jobs are cheaper to automate than have a human to do it without paying salary. Many others are simply not worth doing at all. > Election campain "propaganda" should be legally binding "When the Facts Change, I Change My Mind. What Do You Do, Sir?" > All platforms that reach the level of google search in peoples life should be declared public utility and punished for biases and manipulation of any kind. Why would anybody build a platform like that, then? Punishing for any biases sounds like a hard task as well, as the main use of a platform like google search is the "bias" to include more useful results. Moreover, this kind of thing would become a political too rather quickly. I agree on the idea level, but I don't see any way to do this well.