6 ms·
It's interesting to notice that Apple is earning essentially $0 per year from the presence of Facebook on the app store, while Facebook is earning quite a bit f
by Jyaif 5y ago
It's interesting to notice that Apple is earning essentially $0 per year from the presence of Facebook on the app store, while Facebook is earning quite a bit from their iOS apps. Facebook has no leverage here.
- marstall 5y agoHow much appeal does an iPhone lose though if it doesn’t have Facebook?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 5y agoThey have some leverage- if Apple starts banning all the apps people use they'll be furious. Facebook could make news that's negative of Apple trend more than positive news.
- josephcsible 5y agoFacebook might not make Apple any money via App Store sales, but it does via sales of iPhones. If Facebook and Instagram disappeared from everyone's iPhone, a bunch of people would suddenly switch to Android.
- beardyw 5y agoI use Android but I would feel tempted to get an iPhone if they did do that. Just to confess - did use Facebook in the early days but I've been clean for 10 years.
- ufhghfggf 5y agoAre Facebook and Instagram unusable on mobile Safari, which bypasses the App Store? (I haven't used FB/Insta for years, so I'm not asking a rhetorical question here: I really don't know and I'm genuinely curious.) I do know that viable mobile browser video games that bypass the App Stores are currently impossible to do on both mobile Safari and Android Chrome because I recently tried. Dark patterns are employed, including adding a typical 300ms audio latency to the Web Audio API on Android Chrome[1], and making WebGL perform terrible on iOS Safari, preventing WebGL from going full screen, preventing accelerometer/gyro input "for privacy reasons" etc. [1] Superpowered Android audio latency test database shows how awful Android web audio latency is: https://superpowered.com/latency https://superpowered.com/latency